April 1999
So many times the a criticism of anecdotal is leveled at alternative therapies. Here is my success story. Not a friend of a next door neighbor’s cousin or some such but me personally.
Like too many of us, I was diagnosed with a local recurrence two years after a lumpectomy. I opted for a second lumpectomy against recommendations. That was nothing new for me, I had refused radiation based on my discovery that it offered no survival benefit for women with no lymph node involvement and small tumors(under 2 cm.).
That same month I began an intensive program of alternative treatment. I began the “Kelley” program using metabolic enzyme therapy. I had doubts about its efficacy from the beginning but I stuck with it for about 9 months. I also did a program of colonics and herbs. I flew to Canada with a group of women and learned how to take 714X.
Nothing seemed to work. I continued to produce very slow growing tumors in the breast, culminating in a mastectomy that September 1995. As soon as I woke from the (same day) surgery, my doctor told me I would need radiation to the chest wall as that was now in danger of recurrence. Again I refused, but I was horrified to hear this news.
I went to a clinic in Mexico, spending three weeks learning the Gerson program. I stayed on this program for a full eighteen months. However, while on it I developed a series of small skin recurrences at the scar site. Several were surgically removed and found to have an S phase of just 1.5%, slower than normally growing cells. I felt this demonstrated the basic rightness of my methods to have such a slow growing cancer. Chemotherapy was not appropriate and I had no intentions of using it. In consultation it was decided that I should try high dose Vitamin A. There is plenty of precedent for using this, as retinoic acid. It has been experimented with in lung and head and neck cancers. There has been some work done in breast cancer as well. It has been used in Germany successfully as well. A talk at the American Association of Cancer Researchers discussed a three year trial that had shown efficacy in tumor reduction. Dr. Maurice Black (See more on Dr. Black on this site) and now his associate, Dr. R. Zachrau have been experimenting with Vitamin A for many years.
My physician in Mexico suggested I buy Vitamin A at my local store and use 300,000 I.U.’s each day for the first seven. Then switch to 150,000 daily. I began taking small tablets daily. I found that I needed to break up the dose into two to avoid discomfort. It was strongly suggested that I take a blood test every five weeks to check liver function as Vitamin A is said to be “toxic” to the liver. It might also make the skin on my fingers peel, make me dry and perhaps cause headaches. I faithfully took it from March 1st until I noticed a change in the tumor just three weeks later. I told my husband I thought it might be shrinking. By the next day I knew it was shrinking. I contacted my doctor in Mexico and he said he was so glad I was taking this product-liquid A and of course the liquid Vitamin E at 1600 I.U. Well, that was the first time I had heard that part but since I had experienced tumor reduction, all was well. I did switch to the liquid form which he said left the body more quickly. The Vitamin E was to help balance the overuse of a particular vitamin. I upped my Vitamin C to 4 grams and selenium to 400 mcgs(twice the normal dose).
About eighteen months later I had the remnants of that tumor surgically removed. This is what we found: it was well differentiated, it had very few malignant cells and the estrogen and progesterone receptors had TRIPLED(30% to 90%). Well differentiated meant that it looked like normal cells. Receptor status when it declines is said to be a sign of disease progression. So I was happy. Over the counter vitamins had shown a successful tumor reduction.
There were two problems. The first was that tumor reduction is not necessarily a correlate of increased survival and is an argument I use against the standard drug therapy approval methods. Still it seemed like a victory, especially after the pathology report. Secondly, I had developed another tumor at the same time as I reduced one.
What to do? From my experiences at scientific conferences and my readings, I knew that cancer cells are complex. They can respond one way at one time and another way later. Look at how Tamoxifen could turn from being an estrogen antagonist(anti) to an agoniste (estorgen promoter) over time. Obviously my experience had shown me that some things worked some of the time. I began looking for the next method.
At that time I was sent information about a clinical trial about to begin in New Jersey, using Maitake mushroom extract. I had flirted with this product over the years but never used it seriously or in a committed way. Japanese research had shown that the substance could reduce tumors and modulate the immune system. I purchased four bottles and began using two droppersful daily beginning at the end of June 1998. The tumor was about the size of a long-grain grain of rice set on a vertical axis. I continued to use the product daily until I ran out of it at the end of October. Two and a half weeks later, I noticed that the tumor had gotten smaller. It continued to reduce, I restarted the Maitake as it was the only new thing I had been doing and I felt there was a connection.
As I write this in April 1999, I still have a tiny shred of the tumor. In a similar manner to the reduction in 1997, the tumor first shrunk to half its original size, then shrunk in half daily. I have experienced NO side effects, either from the Vitamin A regimen nor the Maitake extract.
I want to emphasize that these methods are best overseen by a physician especially if you can find a sympathetic one. The cost is really low and I had no negative effects. The original bottle of Vitamin A tablets cost $8.00. The liquid costs about $16 and lasts three weeks. The Maitake D-fraction is a bit more, each bottle between $30 and $45 depending on where you buy it. Still, a small cost even when we have to pay it ourselves. The blood work done every five weeks was mostly covered by insurance. I came to know a lot about how to read blood tests and follow them with interest now.
These methods worked for me. There is nothing special about me except that I faithfully follow a regimen of supplements, healthy eating and detoxification at the same time as I used the above products. If it works for one person, it can surely work for others. At no time have I had chemotherapy or radiation. It is now more than six years since my original diagnosis. Only time will tell but that is true for all of us whether we have cancer or not.
In health,
Ann E. Fonfa
The Annie Appleseed Project (212)545-0050 [email protected] fax 545-0025
www.annieappleseedproject.org
So many times the a criticism of anecdotal is leveled at alternative therapies. Here is my success story. Not a friend of a next door neighbor’s cousin or some such but me personally.
Like too many of us, I was diagnosed with a local recurrence two years after a lumpectomy. I opted for a second lumpectomy against recommendations. That was nothing new for me, I had refused radiation based on my discovery that it offered no survival benefit for women with no lymph node involvement and small tumors(under 2 cm.).
That same month I began an intensive program of alternative treatment. I began the “Kelley” program using metabolic enzyme therapy. I had doubts about its efficacy from the beginning but I stuck with it for about 9 months. I also did a program of colonics and herbs. I flew to Canada with a group of women and learned how to take 714X.
Nothing seemed to work. I continued to produce very slow growing tumors in the breast, culminating in a mastectomy that September 1995. As soon as I woke from the (same day) surgery, my doctor told me I would need radiation to the chest wall as that was now in danger of recurrence. Again I refused, but I was horrified to hear this news.
I went to a clinic in Mexico, spending three weeks learning the Gerson program. I stayed on this program for a full eighteen months. However, while on it I developed a series of small skin recurrences at the scar site. Several were surgically removed and found to have an S phase of just 1.5%, slower than normally growing cells. I felt this demonstrated the basic rightness of my methods to have such a slow growing cancer. Chemotherapy was not appropriate and I had no intentions of using it. In consultation it was decided that I should try high dose Vitamin A. There is plenty of precedent for using this, as retinoic acid. It has been experimented with in lung and head and neck cancers. There has been some work done in breast cancer as well. It has been used in Germany successfully as well. A talk at the American Association of Cancer Researchers discussed a three year trial that had shown efficacy in tumor reduction. Dr. Maurice Black (See more on Dr. Black on this site) and now his associate, Dr. R. Zachrau have been experimenting with Vitamin A for many years.
My physician in Mexico suggested I buy Vitamin A at my local store and use 300,000 I.U.’s each day for the first seven. Then switch to 150,000 daily. I began taking small tablets daily. I found that I needed to break up the dose into two to avoid discomfort. It was strongly suggested that I take a blood test every five weeks to check liver function as Vitamin A is said to be “toxic” to the liver. It might also make the skin on my fingers peel, make me dry and perhaps cause headaches. I faithfully took it from March 1st until I noticed a change in the tumor just three weeks later. I told my husband I thought it might be shrinking. By the next day I knew it was shrinking. I contacted my doctor in Mexico and he said he was so glad I was taking this product-liquid A and of course the liquid Vitamin E at 1600 I.U. Well, that was the first time I had heard that part but since I had experienced tumor reduction, all was well. I did switch to the liquid form which he said left the body more quickly. The Vitamin E was to help balance the overuse of a particular vitamin. I upped my Vitamin C to 4 grams and selenium to 400 mcgs(twice the normal dose).
About eighteen months later I had the remnants of that tumor surgically removed. This is what we found: it was well differentiated, it had very few malignant cells and the estrogen and progesterone receptors had TRIPLED(30% to 90%). Well differentiated meant that it looked like normal cells. Receptor status when it declines is said to be a sign of disease progression. So I was happy. Over the counter vitamins had shown a successful tumor reduction.
There were two problems. The first was that tumor reduction is not necessarily a correlate of increased survival and is an argument I use against the standard drug therapy approval methods. Still it seemed like a victory, especially after the pathology report. Secondly, I had developed another tumor at the same time as I reduced one.
What to do? From my experiences at scientific conferences and my readings, I knew that cancer cells are complex. They can respond one way at one time and another way later. Look at how Tamoxifen could turn from being an estrogen antagonist(anti) to an agoniste (estorgen promoter) over time. Obviously my experience had shown me that some things worked some of the time. I began looking for the next method.
At that time I was sent information about a clinical trial about to begin in New Jersey, using Maitake mushroom extract. I had flirted with this product over the years but never used it seriously or in a committed way. Japanese research had shown that the substance could reduce tumors and modulate the immune system. I purchased four bottles and began using two droppersful daily beginning at the end of June 1998. The tumor was about the size of a long-grain grain of rice set on a vertical axis. I continued to use the product daily until I ran out of it at the end of October. Two and a half weeks later, I noticed that the tumor had gotten smaller. It continued to reduce, I restarted the Maitake as it was the only new thing I had been doing and I felt there was a connection.
As I write this in April 1999, I still have a tiny shred of the tumor. In a similar manner to the reduction in 1997, the tumor first shrunk to half its original size, then shrunk in half daily. I have experienced NO side effects, either from the Vitamin A regimen nor the Maitake extract.
I want to emphasize that these methods are best overseen by a physician especially if you can find a sympathetic one. The cost is really low and I had no negative effects. The original bottle of Vitamin A tablets cost $8.00. The liquid costs about $16 and lasts three weeks. The Maitake D-fraction is a bit more, each bottle between $30 and $45 depending on where you buy it. Still, a small cost even when we have to pay it ourselves. The blood work done every five weeks was mostly covered by insurance. I came to know a lot about how to read blood tests and follow them with interest now.
These methods worked for me. There is nothing special about me except that I faithfully follow a regimen of supplements, healthy eating and detoxification at the same time as I used the above products. If it works for one person, it can surely work for others. At no time have I had chemotherapy or radiation. It is now more than six years since my original diagnosis. Only time will tell but that is true for all of us whether we have cancer or not.
In health,
Ann E. Fonfa
The Annie Appleseed Project (212)545-0050 [email protected] fax 545-0025
www.annieappleseedproject.org