References: A Critical Overview of Homeopathy

1. Jonas WB, Jacobs J. Healing with Homeopathy: The Complete Guide. New York: Warner; 1996.

2. Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine. Los Angeles: JP Tarcher; 1982.

3. Maddox J, Randi J, Stewart WW. "High-dilution" experiments a delusion. [PMID: 2455869] Nature. 1988;334:287-91.

4. Kent JT. What is homoeopathy? Homoeopathic Physician. 1885;5:346-51.

5. Linde K, Jonas WB. Evaluating complementary and alternative medicine: the balance of rigor and relevance. In: Jonas WB, Levin JS, eds. Essentials of Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1999:57-71.

6. Haehl R. Samuel Hahnemann: His Life and Work. London: Homeopathic Publishing; 1922.

7. Rothstein WG. American Physicians in the 19th Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ Pr; 1992.

8. Roberts WH. Orthodoxy vs. homeopathy: ironic developments following the Flexner Report at the Ohio State University. [PMID: 3516284] Bull Hist Med. 1986;60:73-87.

9. Persons S. The decline of homeopathy—the University of Iowa, 1876-1919. [PMID: 2021694] Bull Hist Med. 1991;65:74-87.

10. Coulter HL. Divided Legacy: The Conflict Between Homeopathy and the American Medical Association. vol 3. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books; 1981.

11. Leland PW. Empiricism and its causes. Boston Medical Surgery Journal. 1852;47:283-90.

12. Parker WW. Was Hahnemann insane? JAMA. 1886:7-9.

13. Joslin BF. Lecture on cholera. Eclectic Medical Journal. 1849;8:363-8.

14. Kaptchuk TJ. Intentional ignorance: a history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine. [PMID: 9780448] Bull Hist Med. 1998;72:389-433.

15. Kaptchuk TJ. When does unbiased become biased? The dilemma of homeopathic proving and modern research methods. British Journal of Homeopathy. 1996;85:237-47.

16. Cassedy J. American Medicine and Statistical Thinking, 1800–1860. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Pr; 1984.

17. Leary B. Cholera 1854: update. British Homeopathic Journal. 1994;83:117-21.

18. Fye WB. Nitroglycerin: a homeopathic remedy. [PMID: 2866851] Circulation. 1986;73:21-9.

19. Nicholls PA. Homeopathy and the Medical Profession. London: Croom Helm; 1988.

20. Ernst E, Kaptchuk TJ. Homeopathy revisited. [PMID: 8885813] Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2162-4.

21. Rogers N. An Alternative Path: The Making and Remaking of Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital in Philadelphia. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ Pr; 1998.

22. Mukherjee JK. The biological background of Hahnemannians vital force. Hahn Glean. 1964;31:163-8.

23. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. [PMID: 9820257] JAMA. 1998;280:1569-75.

24. Jacobs J, Chapman EH, Crothers D. Patient characteristics and practice patterns of physicians using homeopathy. [PMID: 9821827] Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:537-40.

25. How to use high potencies. Homoeopathic Physician. 1882;2:73-73.

26. Jonas WB, Ernst E. The safety of homeopathy. In: Jonas WB, Levin J, eds. Essentials of Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:167-71.

27. Hróbjartsson A, Gøtzsche PC. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. [PMID: 11372012] N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1594-602.

28. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G. Clinical trials of homoeopathy. [PMID: 1825800] BMJ. 1991;302:316-23.

29. Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. [PMID: 9310601] Lancet. 1997;350:834-43.

30. Linde K, Melchart D. Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of-the-art review. [PMID: 9884175] J Altern Complement Med. 1998;4:371-88.

31. Ernst E. Classical homoeopathy versus conventional treatments: a systematic review. Perfusion. 1999;12:13-5.

32. Cucherat M, Haugh MC, Gooch M, Boissel JP. Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy. A meta-analysis of clinical trials. HMRAG. Homeopathic Medicines Research Advisory Group. [PMID: 10853874] Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;56:27-33.

33. Walach H. Unspezifische Therapie-Effekte. Das Beispiel Homöopathie [PhD thesis]. Freiburg, Germany: Psychologische Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg; 1997.

34. Jadad AR, McQuay HJ. Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology. [PMID: 8606325] J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:235-43.

35. Egger M, Juni P, Holenstein F, Sterne JA. Are the Clinical Effects of Homeopathy Bias Effects? Bristol, United Kingdom: Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol; 2001.

36. Lewin D. Meta-analysis: a new standard or clinical fool’s gold. Journal of NIH Research. 1996;8:30-1.

37. Linde K, Willich SN. How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. [PMID: 12519797] J R Soc Med. 2003;96:17-22.

38. Ernst E. Homeopathic prophylaxis of headaches and migraine? A systematic review. [PMID: 10584459] J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999;18:353-7.

39. Ernst E. Does homeopathic Arnica montana reduce delayed onset muscle soreness? A meta-analysis. Perfusion. 1997;11:29-35.

40. Ernst E, Pittler MH. Efficacy of homeopathic arnica: a systematic review of placebo-controlled clinical trials. [PMID: 9820349] Arch Surg. 1998;133:1187-90.

41. Lüdtke R, Wilkens J. Klinische Wirksamkeitsstudien zu Arnica in homöopathischen Zubereitungen. In: Albrecht H, Frühwald M, eds. Jahrbuch der Karl und Veronica Carstens-Stiftung, Band 5 (1998). Essen, Germany: KVC-Verlag; 1999:97-112.

42. Vickers AJ, Smith C. Homoeopathic Oscillococcinum for preventing and treating influenza and influenza-like syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;CD001957. [PMID: 10796675].

43. Wiesenauer M, Lüdtke R. A meta-analysis of the homeopathic treatment of pollinosis with Galphimia glauca. Forsch Komplementärmed. 1996;3:230-6.

44. Barnes J, Resch KL, Ernst E. Homeopathy for postoperative ileus? A meta-analysis. [PMID: 9451677] J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997;25:628-33.

45. Linde K, Jobst KA. Homeopathy for chronic asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;:CD000353. [PMID: 10796532].

46. Jonas WB, Linde K, Ramirez G. Homeopathy and rheumatic disease. [PMID: 10680199] Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2000;26:117-23.

47. Taylor MA, Reilly D, Llewellyn-Jones RH, McSharry C, Aitchison TC. Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial series. [PMID: 10948025] BMJ. 2000;321:471-6.

48. Lewith GT, Watkins AD, Hyland ME, Shaw S, Broomfield JA, Dolan G, et al. Use of ultramolecular potencies of allergen to treat asthmatic people allergic to house dust mite: double blind randomised controlled clinical trial. [PMID: 11872551] BMJ. 2002;324:520-3.

49. Jacobs J, Jiménez LM, Gloyd SS, Gale JL, Crothers D. Treatment of acute childhood diarrhea with homeopathic medicine: a randomized clinical trial in Nicaragua. [PMID: 8165068] Pediatrics. 1994;93:719-25.

50. Jacobs J, Jonas WB, Jimenez-Perez M, Crothers D. Homeopathy for childhood diarrhea: combined results and meta-analysis from three randomized controlled trials. Pediatr Infect Dis. 2003; [In press].

51. Jacobs JW, Rasker JJ, Van Riel PL, Gribnau FW, van de Putte LB. [Alternative treatment methods in rheumatic diseases; a literature review]. [PMID: 2008219] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1991;135:317-22.

52. Davenas E, Beauvais F, Amara J, Oberbaum M, Robinzon B, Miadonna A, et al. Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE. [PMID: 2455231] Nature. 1988;333:816-8.

53. Hirst SJ, Hayes NA, Burridge J, Pearce FL, Foreman JC. Human basophil degranulation is not triggered by very dilute antiserum against human IgE. [PMID: 8255290] Nature. 1993;366:525-7.

54. Ovelgönne JH, Bol AW, Hop WC, van Wijk R. Mechanical agitation of very dilute antiserum against IgE has no effect on basophil staining properties. [PMID: 1376282] Experientia. 1992;48:504-8.

55. Jonas WB, Lin Y, Williams A, Tortella R, Tuma R. Treatment of experimental stroke with low-dose glutamate and homeopathic Arnica Montana. Perfusion. 1999;12:452-62.

56. Jonas WB, Dillner DK. Protection of mice from tularemia infection with ultra-low, serial agitated dilutions prepared from F. tularensis-infected tissue. Journal of Scientific Exploration. 2000;14:35-52.

57. Jonas W, Lin Y, Tortella F. Neuroprotection from glutamate toxicity with ultra-low dose glutamate. [PMID: 11209946] Neuroreports. 2001;12:335-9.

58. Belon P, Cumps J, Ennis M, Mannaioni PF, Sainte-Laudy J, Roberfroid M, et al. Inhibition of human basophil degranulation by successive histamine dilutions: results of a European multi-centre trial. [PMID: 10350142] Inflamm Res. 1999;48(suppl 1):17-8.

59. Linde K, Jonas WB, Melchart D, Worku F, Wagner H, Eitel F. Critical review and meta-analysis of serial agitated dilutions in experimental toxicology. [PMID: 7917505] Hum Exp Toxicol. 1994;13:481-92.

60. Vickers AJ. Independent replication of pre-clinical research in homeopathy: a systematic review. [PMID: 10649002] Forsch Komplementarmed. 1999;6:311-20.

61. Jonas WB, Anderson RL, Crawford CC, Lyons JS. A systematic review of the quality of homeopathic clinical trials. [PMID: 11801202] BMC Complement Altern Med. 2001;1:12-12.

62. Jonas WB. The homeopathy debate [Letter]. [PMID: 10890328] J Altern Complement Med. 2000;6:213-5.

Remember we are NOT Doctors and have NO medical training.

This site is like an Encylopedia - there are many pages, many links on many topics.

Support our work with any size DONATION - see left side of any page - for how to donate. You can help raise awareness of CAM.