Medicinal Cannabis Does Not Influence the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan and Docetaxel Frederike K. Engelsa, Floris A. de Jonga, Alex Sparrebooma,c, Ron A. A. Mathotb, Walter J. Loosa, Jos J. E. M. Kitzena, Peter de Bruijna, Jaap Verweija, Ron H. J. Mathijssena aDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam—Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; bDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; cDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA Correspondence: Floris A. de Jong, Ph.D., Erasmus MC – Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Telephone: 31-10-4391-112; Fax: 31-10-4391-053; e-mail: f.a.dejong@erasmusmc.nl Objective. To date, data regarding the potential of cannabinoids to modulate cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A (CYP3A) activity are contradictory. Recently, a standardized medicinal cannabis product was introduced in The Netherlands. We anticipated an increased use of medicinal cannabis concurrent with anticancer drugs, and undertook a drug-interaction study to evaluate the effect of concomitant medicinal cannabis on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and docetaxel, both subject to CYP3A-mediated biotransformation. Patients and Methods. Twenty-four cancer patients were treated with i.v. irinotecan (600 mg, n = 12) or docetaxel (180 mg, n = 12), followed 3 weeks later by the same drugs concomitant with medicinal cannabis (200 ml herbal tea, 1 g/l) for 15 consecutive days, starting 12 days before the second treatment. Blood samples were obtained up to 55 hours after dosing and analyzed for irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G), respectively, or docetaxel. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed during both treatments. Results are reported as the mean ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the observed pharmacokinetic parameters with and without concomitant medicinal cannabis. Results. Medicinal cannabis administration did not significantly influence exposure to and clearance of irinotecan (1.04; CI, 0.96–1.11 and 0.97; CI, 0.90–1.05, respectively) or docetaxel (1.11; CI, 0.94–1.28 and 0.95; CI, 0.82–1.08, respectively). Conclusion. Coadministration of medicinal cannabis, as herbal tea, in cancer patients treated with irinotecan or docetaxel does not significantly influence the plasma pharmacokinetics of these drugs. The evaluated variety of medicinal cannabis can be administered concomitantly with both anticancer agents without dose adjustments. The Oncologist, Vol. 12, No. 3, 291-300, March 2007; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-3-291 Remember we are NOT Doctors and have NO medical training. This site is like an Encylopedia - there are many pages, many links on many topics. Support our work with any size DONATION - see left side of any page - for how to donate. You can help raise awareness of CAM.