 |  | 

"PVC" stands for polyvinyl chloride, the type of plastic used to make approximately 25 percent of the disposable plastic products used in health care today - products such as IV bags, tubing and office supplies.
Health Care Without Harm is calling for the phaseout of PVC medical products, where alternatives are available, because of health concerns from two toxic chemicals associated with the use, production and disposal of PVC:
Dioxin, a group of persistent and very toxic chemicals that are the unwanted by-products of PVC incineration and production
DEHP (di-ethylhexyl-phthalate), a developmental and reproductive toxin and the plasticizer used to make PVC soft and flexible
FDA ISSUES PUBLIC HEALTH NOTIFICATION ON PHTHALATES IN MEDICAL DEVICES: ALTERNATIVES TO PVC SHOULD BE USED FOR PATIENTS RECEIVING CERTAIN MEDICAL TREATMENTS, AGENCY SAYS Washington DC, July 15, 2002 –
Late last Friday, the Food and Drug Administration issued a Public Health Notification recommending that health care providers take precautions to limit the exposure of the developing male to di-2-ethylhexyl-phthalate (DEHP) – a chemical softener used in medical devices made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC).
The FDA document said that alternatives to DEHP-containing PVC medical devices should be used when possible for certain medical procedures. However, the FDA failed to require labeling of DEHP-containing medical devices, leaving health care providers with no way of knowing which products are leaching potentially unsafe doses of DEHP.
“FDA’s Public Health Notification falls far short of what is needed to protect patients from DEHP in medical devices,” said Charlotte Brody, RN, Executive Director of Health Care Without Harm. “While FDA acknowledges that certain patients may be receiving unsafe doses of DEHP, and acknowledges that there are alternatives to DEHP-containing products, FDA does not give health care providers the one tool they need to protect their patients—a labeling requirement for all products that contain this harmful chemical.”
FDA’s long-awaited Public Health Notification – issued July 12, 2002 and posted at www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/dehp.pdf – is a follow up to the agency’s September 2001 safety assessment on DEHP in medical devices.
The safety assessment found that some medical products made from PVC may expose patients to unsafe amounts of the toxic chemical DEHP, which is used to soften PVC medical devices such as bags and tubing used to administer fluids, medication, blood, oxygen, and nutritional formulas to patients.
The FDA notification states: “Exposure to DEHP has produced a range of adverse effects in laboratory animals, but of greatest concern are effects on the development of the male reproductive system and production of normal sperm in young animals. We have not received reports of these adverse events in humans, but there have been no studies to rule them out.
However, in view of the available animal data, precautions should be taken to limit the exposure of the developing male to DEHP.” FDA acknowledged that there are alternatives to DEHP-containing PVC medical devices and recommends “considering such alternatives when these high-risk procedures are to be performed on male neonates, pregnant women who are carrying male fetuses, and peripubertal males.”
It lists the following high-risk procedures:
exchange transfusion in neonates
ECMO in neonates
total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) in neonates (with lipids in PVC bag)
multiple procedures in sick neonates (high cumulative exposure)
hemodialysis in peripubertal males
hemodialysis in pregnant or lactating women
enteral nutrition in neonates and adults
heart transplantation or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (aggregate dose)
massive infusion of blood into trauma patient
transfusion in adults undergoing ECMO FDA recommends a website associated with the University of Massachusetts Lowell for information on alternative medical devices that do not contain DEHP-plasticized PVC:
www.sustainablehospitals.org.
The FDA Public Health Notification comes right on the heels of new information released last week by Health Care Without Harm, the Environmental Working Group and Coming Clean about the presence of phthalates in cosmetics.
In response to a report released by the groups July 10, more than 3,000 letters have already been sent to FDA demanding that the agency require labeling of phthalates in consumer products.
“The FDA’s notification about phthalates in medical devices not only ignores the concerns raised in those letters but also ignores common sense,” Brody said. “How can women protect themselves from phthalates in cosmetics, how can doctors and nurses protect their patients from phthalates in medical devices, when they have no way of knowing which products contain phthalates?”
Health Care Without Harm represents more than 360 organizations worldwide that are working to reduce the environmental and public health impacts of the health care industry.
For more information on phthalates in cosmetics, see www.nottoopretty.org.
For more on phthalates in medical devices, see www.noharm.org.
|
 |  |  | 
 Abstract #C127
Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Res, 2003

|  |  |  | 
 J Environmental Health Perspectives, 6/05

|  |
Remember we are NOT Doctors and have NO medical training.
This site is like an Encylopedia - there are many pages, many links on many topics.
Support our work with any size DONATION - see left side of any page - for how to donate. You can help raise awareness of CAM. |
|