 |  | 

Ornish Takes on Cancer (from Dr. Greger Newsletter, Fall 2005)
Until Dean Ornish published his landmark study in 1990, most
cardiologists saw heart disease as an inexorable part of old age and
treated it largely palliatively, going to great lengths--even open
heart surgery--to alleviate the pain and disability.
What Dr. Ornish
showed was that heart disease could be not only slowed down, but
actually reversed with a plant-based diet and other lifestyle
changes.[1] People learned they could quite literally take their life
in their own hands and cure themselves of a debilitating
life-threatening disease once thought incurable.
The broader
implication, of course, was that a plant-based diet could potentially
prevent heart disease in the first place.
Largely ignoring the evidence Ornish presented, physicians of today,
however, continue to talk of merely decreasing the risk of heart
disease. As Dr. William Roberts, editor of the American Journal of
Cardiology, points out "Pediatricians do not focus on decreasing the
risk of mumps, measles, pertussis, or rheumatic fever.
They focus on
preventing these illnesses entirely. The same concept needs to be
applied to atherosclerotic events."[2] Having demonstrated we could
prevent and cure our number one killer without drugs and surgery,
Ornish has now decided to take on killer number two, cancer.
Ornish knew that many plant foods--certain vegetables, tomato
products, and soy--seem to reduce one's risk of prostate cancer and
many animal foods--namely milk, cheese, eggs, fish[3] and other
meat--have been shown to increase one's risk of dying from prostate
cancer.[4]
So Ornish wondered what would happen if he took patients
who already had cancer and fed them a strictly plant-based
diet--"predominantly fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes and
soy products." As prostate cancer is the number one cancer among men,
the Department of Defense provided funding for the study.
Ornish found 93 men with early biopsy-proven prostate cancer who
volunteered to forgo radiation, chemo and surgery. He then randomized
the cancer patients into lifestyle modification group, which included
a strictly plant-based diet along with other healthy behaviors such
as walking 30 minutes six days a week, or a control group which just
watched and waited.
A year later the results were tallied and
published in the September 2005 issue of the Journal of Urology, the
official journal of the American Urological Association.
By the end of the year-long study, six of the control group patients
had dropped out because their tumors were growing.
MRI's or
diagnostic tests of cancer activity showed that their tumors were
growing at such a rate that they decided they could wait no longer
and opted for a combination of radical surgery, chemotherapy or
radiation.
Not one of the vegan diet group suffered the same fate. In
fact, while on average cancer activity increased in the control
group, as measured by PSA tests, the cancer markers DECREASED in the
lifestyle modification group. By the end of the year the cancer
growth rate, as measured by these tests, was highly significantly
different between the two groups.
For those on the plant-based diet,
the cancer markers were going down.[5]
These results are nothing short of revolutionary. "This is the first
randomized trial showing that the progression of prostate cancer can
be stopped or perhaps even reversed by changing diet and lifestyle
alone," Ornish told the Washington Post.[6]
Cancer takes
years--sometimes even decades--to grow. The fact that one might be
able to make a difference this late in the game is astounding. If you
smoke and get lung cancer, even if you choose to then finally stop
smoking, it is very often too little, far too late. The cancer is
already there and chances are it will still kill you.
How could
dietary changes have such a dramatic effect in people already
diagnosed with cancer? Maybe a vegan diet boosts the cancer-fighting
arm of your immune system? Ornish and his fellow researchers were
intent on finding out.
The researchers took flasks of human cancer cells and incubated them
with the blood taken from the cancer patients at the year's end. The
blood serum taken from those that did nothing but watch and wait for
a year only weakly inhibited the cancer cells, reducing their growth
by only 9%.
But the serum taken from those who spent the past year on
the plant-based diet inhibited cancer growth 70%, almost an 8-fold
difference! And Ornish found that the closer the patients stuck to
the program, the better their results were--the more their own cancer
seemed to be dwindling and the better their own blood was at killing
cancer cells in the lab.
Dr. Ornish may have been naive to think that the cardiology
profession would embrace his earlier work demonstrating as
essentially unnecessary the majority of procedures by which cardiac
surgeons derived their income.
He was prepared, however, for the
backlash from urologists, who's bread and butter include radical
prostatectomies and brachytherapy (the implantion of radioactive
pellets in through the rectum). One urologist attached a note to
Ornish's paper trying to downplay the fact that the diet group's
blood serum was so much more efficient in killing cancer cells.
"Experimental serum seemed to contain something that differentially
inhibited cell line growth but so what?" the urologist wrote.
"Just
because these serums were different does not mean that there were
good. They might have also killed normal cells."
This shows how mired some physicians remain in the slash and burn
mentality that too often typifies allopathic medicine. Ornish
responded "Although it is true that chemotherapy and radiation may
kill normal as well cancerous cells, we are not aware of any evidence
that fruits vegetables, whole grains, legumes and soy products kill
normal cells."
He then of course goes on to cite all the evidence
that in fact the reverse is more likely the case, as many of the
phytonutrients in whole plant foods are actually protective of normal
cells.[7]
Typical side-effects of conventional prostate cancer treatments are
impotence and incontinence. What were the side-effects of the diet
and lifestyle group? First off, a highly significant improvement in
their cholesterol--dramatically decreasing the risk of these men
dying from a heart attack while they were waiting for their cancers
to disappear.
The same diet that prevents heart disease also prevents
cancer. And diabetes, and obesity, and hypertension, and
constipation, diverticulitis, appendicitis--the list goes on and on.
Yeah, but how was the quality of life of those undertaking these
"intensive" lifestyle changes?
I have often had patients jokingly ask
if they are going to live longer on a healthy diet or is it just
going to SEEM longer. But patients in this study dramatically
changing their diet reported a marked improvement in quality of life
overall. As Dean Ornish put it, "While fear of dying may not be a
sustainable motivator, joy of living often is."[8]
REFERENCES:
(Full text of specific articles available by emailing
article-request@DrGreger.org)
[1] Ornish D, et al. 1990. Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary
heart disease? The Lifestyle Heart Trial. Lancet 336(8708):129-33.
[2] Roberts WC. 1999. Shifting from decreasing risk to actually
preventing and arresting atherosclerosis. American Journal of
Cardiology 83(5):816-7.
[3] Allen NE, et al. 2004. A prospective study of diet and prostate
cancer in Japanese men. Cancer Causes Control 15(9):911-20.
[4] Snowdon DA, Phillips RL, and W Choi. Diet, obesity, and risk of
fatal prostate cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology
120(1984):244-50.
[5] Ornish D, et al. 2005. Intensive lifestyle changes may affect the
progression of prostate cancer. Journal of Urology. 174:1065-70.
[6] Stein R. Diet, exercise and reduced stress slow prostate cancer.
Washington Post, August 11, 2005: A06.
[7] Ornish D, et al. 2005. Intensive lifestyle changes may affect the
progression of prostate cancer. Journal of Urology. 174:1065-70.
[8] Ornish D. 2002. Statins and the soul of medicine. American
Journal of Cardiology 89(11):1286-90.
Source:
http://www.DrGreger.org/newsletters.html
|
Remember we are NOT Doctors and have NO medical training.
This site is like an Encylopedia - there are many pages, many links on many topics.
Support our work with any size DONATION - see left side of any page - for how to donate. You can help raise awareness of CAM. |
|